4chat

He had not transferred the insurance policy to the company. After the sale, Macaura continued to insure the plantation in his own name. When Macaura attempted to claim on the policy, the company refused to pay.

The issue was whether Macaura had an insurable interest at the time of the loss.

In this case, a separate corporate entity was brought into existence outside the taxable territory with the ulterior motive of evading the tax obligation by the assessee mills.

In a sole proprietorship or partnership, the owners personally liable.The principle in Salomon’s Case that a company is a legally different person from those who control it represents the current law in Ireland.For example, if I form a company called ‘Murphy & Co Ltd’ in which I own one hundred per cent of the shares and am a director and employee, legally speaking the company and myself are two distinct people.But in certain exceptional cases the Court is entitled to lift the veil of corporate entity and to pay regard to the economic realities behind the legal facade.For example, the Court has power to disregard the corporate entity if it is used for tax evasion or to circumvent tax obligation." Appear before the House of Lords concerning the principle of lifting the corporate veil Macaura own land on which stood timber.

Search for 4chat:

4chat-504chat-774chat-25

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “4chat”