Automatic transfers consolidating pension savings kabbalah info dating
Participants could not withdraw the funds until age 55, and could not borrow from the account.
The Master IRA could be converted to a Roth, but only at the discretion of the participant after demonstrating he/she is the rightful owner.
Leaving these assets in the former employer plan makes no sense and guarantees poor performance and ultimate loss of proper use of the funds.
Consolidating them into a Master IRA account would insure continuity of the investment return, effective marshaling of the assets, and hopefully sustain the value of the assets while keeping pace with inflation.
At minimum, it would likely require significant IT resources to allow two disparate systems to share data.
A more likely scenario would involve entirely new systems for both the DOL and PBGC – an investment requiring millions of dollars.
As CEO of Pen Checks Trust™, one of the largest independent providers of administration and custodial services for Default/Missing Participant IRAs (and one of the firms interviewed by the GAO), I would like to present my analysis of this important document, focusing on three broad areas as covered in the report.
The timing of the study played an important role in many of the GAO’s conclusions.
Plus, the PBGC has no jurisdiction over defined contribution plans (with the exception of money purchase plans, which also seem to be going away).Currently, the reporting and filing requirements for terminating and abandoned plans occurs entirely with the DOL.Turning these over to the PBGC would result in a large data gap that would be difficult and expensive to close.Thereafter, each time the participant changes employers, their account balance – regardless of size – would automatically be transferred to the Master IRA account.This account would remain with the participant for their whole working career and would be tied to a registry of accounts, such as the National Registry of Unclaimed Retirement Benefits.